Tim Johnson, editor
March 25, 2001
An army general, making a speech recently to an assembled group of military leaders, said, "All the technology in the world will never eliminate the need for the foot soldier."
Soon after reading the above quotation, we attended a number of meetings where church leaders gather - planning sessions, leadership seminars, elders' meetings, workshops, and the rest. We heard practically every plan imaginable proposed that would convert the world without our having to get out and do it personally. It is amazing what the human brain can come up with if it will eliminate personal involvement.
We want our "programs" to convert the world. We advertise, and bring in "experts" to enthuse us. We appoint committees and delegate authority - anything to keep from having to get out and eyeball a sinner and tell him that he is a sinner and that only Jesus can save him.
"It pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe" (I Cor. 1:21). And, He made preachers out of every one of us. We do not have an option. We are all - men and women alike - under the greatest of all commissions. This was the choice of God, which demonstrates the wisdom of God - that they can't believe in whom they have not heard, and they can't hear without a preacher (Rom. 10:14). The power is still in the foot soldier. The Lord's army is not a machine, directed by armchair generals from an elder's room; it is a world-covering horde of saved-by-grace people who appreciate it.
We are personally glad that the eunuch, when he started home from Jerusalem, did not have to wait for Phillip to get his degree in missionology, nor for the church somewhere to put him in their budget. We still need foot soldiers.
The Lord didn't lay the task of evangelism upon machinery; He laid it upon men. All the mass media, however helpful, cannot substitute for one saint communicating the one gospel to one sinner. That's the way the world will be saved - if it is ever saved. God did not give His commission to angels, or even to a committee, but to men - to individuals.
We do not need enthusiasm in the pulpit like we need commitment in the pew. We are part of our own problem when we should provide the solution - foot soldiers.
By Don McWhorter, via The Graphic Evangelist
"Therefore, we ought to give the more earnest heed to the things that were heard, lest haply we drift away from them" (Hebrews 2:1, ASV).
The word drifting aptly describes the process of apostasy. It is seldom accomplished by giant leaps; rather it is the result of short steps. The steps appear to be only the slightest variation from the accepted truth and altogether innocent, but each one is used as justification for the next one until truth has been left completely, even by individuals who would never have dreamed it possible.
We have known of congregations where a piano was first allowed in the basement to teach children how to sing. But having learned with it, the children continued to need it in their Bible classes. Once this was allowed, someone asked the difference in young folks and adults - the difference in Wednesday night and Sunday night. No logical difference could be shown so it was allowed at those times. Then someone had only to point out the inconsistency in using it Sunday night and refusing it Sunday morning, and from then on it was used at all services, a thing that would have been opposed when the piano was first moved into the basement.
A group of Americans preaching in Africa said they were strongly opposed to churches of Christ operating a hospital in the United States. But they thought churches could and should support a nurse in Nigeria to treat wounds and minor illnesses. But once the nurse was supported, a hospital was proposed. Anyone who objected would be asked, "If you can support a nurse and clinic, why not a doctor and hospital?" No logical difference could be shown, so the hospital was built. Now often heard is a proposal for a Church of Christ Hospital in the United States. The argument: "If we can do it in Nigeria, why not here?" Granted that premise, no sound reason can be given. It all started with letting a church support a nurse.
A church we know has a kitchen. They defend it on the grounds that it costs the church nothing. The kitchen and equipment were in the building when it was purchased and they have a minimum electric and water bill each month, anyway. But a generation will arise that is accustomed to the kitchen. They will want to build a new building and they will want a kitchen. Their argument will be "We've always had a kitchen. If we could have it in the old building, why not in the new?" There will be no chance of keeping it out.
In our town, a kindergarten is beginning in the meetinghouse of one of the churches. In a news item, it is stated, "The kindergarten will be at the church, but will not be operated by the church." This will satisfy the minds of many who would object to the church operating or supporting a school of any kind.
But one of these days another step will be proposed. It may be opening a first grade. If someone objects, the question will be raised, "But what is the difference in a first grade and kindergarten?" There is no difference, so the opposition will be silenced and the way will be clear for second grade, third grade, etc., etc.
But some day the school will need to be subsidized. Those opposed to support of education will rise up to object. But someone will say, "It's true we haven't been contributing from the treasury, but we have been providing a place for the school and it has been using the name of the church. Now if we can contribute facilities and influence, why not money?" That question will be hard to answer, for there is no difference and the opposition will then be silenced.
From this, the next logical step will be to send money to a college, for, after all, what is the difference between contributing to our own school and contributing to one operated by someone else? And it all began with a kindergarten, which "will be at the church, but will not be operated by the church."
Truly, "Mighty Oaks from little acorns grow." The mistake is ever allowing an acorn to get mixed with the seed of the kingdom. Every innovation, regardless of how small, must be rejected, not only for its own sake, but also for the sake of attendant corruptions that will surely follow in its train.
By Sewell Hall, via The Graphic Evangelist