|
|
The Bulletin |
||
|
Tim Johnson, editor |
March 31, 2002 |
||
|
|
Examining the Methodists Introduction: There are over fourteen million Methodists in the United States today, and several million more are scattered throughout the world (Mead, 1980). Although their growth rate has been declining in recent years, United Methodist Churches make up one of the largest and most influential Protestant denominations in the United States. Methodism played an important historical role in shaping American values. The circuit-riding preacher of the western frontier was typically a Methodist minister. Camp meetings, originated by Presbyterians, were popularized by the Methodists. Methodist churches have set the standard among denominations for church involvement in social reform. And, more than any other major denominational group, Methodists have been responsible for encouraging toleration of differing beliefs and doctrines among those who call themselves Christians. When the history of the Methodist movement is considered, it becomes easier to see why a Methodist might not be too concerned about specific points of doctrine. Hopefully, when we come to understand the Methodist position, we will be better equipped to show him that what a person believes does make a difference. Distinctive Points of Methodist Belief and Practice 1. Toleration of Varying Doctrines and Beliefs. Among Methodists, "There is wide freedom in the interpretation and practice of all doctrines; liberals and conservatives work in close harmony" (Mead, 1980, p. 177). Methodists come by their religious tolerance honestly -- their attitude matches that of the founder of their church. John Wesley said, "You cannot be admitted into the church, or society, of the Presbyterians, Anabaptists, Quakers, or any others, unless you hold the same opinions with them, and adhere to the same mode of worship. The Methodists alone do not insist on your holding this or that opinion; but they think, and let think! Neither do they impose any particular mode of worship..." (Luccock, et al, 1926, p. 191). 2. Church Government and Organization. Although Methodist church government is called episcopal, much of the real power resides in conferences composed of elected delegates. These conferences begin at the church level and progress to District Conferences, Annual Conferences, the General Conference and the Jurisdictional Conference. The regional Annual Conferences ordain ministers, supervise pensions, and elect delegates to the General Conference. Pastors of local churches are appointed by a Bishop for a renewable one-year term each year at the Annual Conference. Powerful District Superintendents within each Annual Conference assist the Conference Bishop in making these assignments. The General Conference meets every four years as the law making body of the church with the Bishops presiding. Bishops are elected, re--assigned, or retired in the Jurisdictional Conference, which is composed of many of the same delegates as the General Conference. 3. The Methodist Church is a branch of the universal church. Methodism is denominational to its core. Their position has been that "all other evangelical churches were to be acknowledged and respected as true churches of Jesus Christ" (Short, 1974, p. 35) John Wesley not only continued in fellowship with the Church of England, but accepted Catholics, Moravians and members of similar groups as true Christians. 4. The grace of God freely available for all. On this point John Wesley, and many Methodists, disagree with Calvin. They hold that the power of the blood of Christ has not been limited by God's previous choices. On the other hand, man's will is not viewed as being totally free -- he must receive help from God before he can do right. 5. Salvation by faith alone and the experience of conversion and new life in Christ. Wesley's conversion experience is similar to that claimed by many Methodists. However, they do not insist that conversion be sudden or dramatic; it can occur gradually over time.
Cross-points The following is a comparison of official Methodist doctrine as found in their Discipline with the official doctrine of Christ as found in the Bible. These points of contrast are merely representative; many more could be given.
Weak Points in Methodism 1. They write their own laws. Methodists proudly proclaim that they "are a people choosing to be governed by a law which, in the end, they themselves have written" (Short, 1974, p. 25). While that is a very democratic idea, anyone can see the weakness in it when it comes to religion. It leads to laws that are based on principles of convenience and popularity, rather than truth and righteousness. 2. They tolerate many differing doctrines. Any religious group that demonstrates almost no power or inclination to determine what its members are to believe is weak by definition. The Methodists' lack of concern over what doctrines are held among them has led to worldliness and liberal theology within their ranks. They say it doesn't make any difference what you believe, but it has made a difference --their denomination has drifted further and further into the world in many practical areas. Methodists would do well to study First and Second Timothy. In I Timothy 4:6 Paul refers to the "good doctrine" which Timothy had "carefully followed." In 4:16 Paul instructs Timothy to "Take heed to yourself and to the doctrine." In 5:2-3 Paul says that if anyone does not consent "to the doctrine which is according to godliness, he is proud, knowing nothing..." In II Timothy 4:1-4 we read of those who "will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, because they have itching ears, they will heap up for themselves teachers; and they will turn their ears away from the truth..." Did Paul think we should tolerate many differing doctrines? 3. They claim that their traditions must be Scriptural in order to be right, but have many traditions which are contrary to Scripture. Their 1980 Discipline states, "All church traditions profess themselves bound to Scripture for their original insights and may rightly be judged by their essential faithfulness to its disclosures" (p. 79). Really? Are practices like infant baptism, voting on bishops, salvation by faith only, choirs, instrumental music or writing your own church laws faithful to any scriptural "disclosures"? -- by Steve Klein
|